AUDJPY – Hang Seng Index- EEM divergence
AUDJPY used to be a very good indicator of ‘intermarket correlation’. It clearly tracked Asian stock market indices such as Hang Seng Index, Singapore Index Futures (SiMSCI) and MSCI Emerging Markets Index (EEM). The positive correlation could be due to 2 dynamics:
- AUD tends to do well when Asian economies like China are doing well (think of Australian exports of iron ore, other commodities)
- JPY tended to strengthen due to repatriation when its stock market i.e. Nikkei 225 is not doing well (which also tracks Asian indices).
At the moment AUDJPY has diverged from Hang Seng Index and EEM; a convergence of the three requires 1) strengthening AUDJPY or 2) deflating HSI and EEM.
Strong positive correlation between the three
Chart #1 – EEM, HSI, SiMSCI, China A50 and AUDJPY overlay published on 27 January 2016
- Highs and lows march closely which is a sign of positive correlation.
- Correlation visible as far back as 2011.
- There was one episode of divergence which subsequently converged. This divergence was due to strong Hang Seng Index driven by Shanghai Hong Kong Connect. SHHK commenced on 17 November 2014 and topped/popped in the middle of June 2015.
- There is a divergence at the moment.
Chart #2 – AUDJPY and Nikkei 225 overlay, daily chart from June 2015 – present
- This chart demonstrates the ‘JPY-strengthening’ dynamic due to stock market performance.
- Highs and lows match closely which is a sign of positive correlation.
- Worthwhile to note that from the Jun2 2015 start to present, both has suffered near equal loss – another evidence of their correlation.
Divergence at moment, stocks rising with falling AUDJPY
Starting some time in July, HSI and EEM strengthened while AUDJPY. Unless their positive correlation (due two dynamics due to mentioned in first paragraph) is no longer valid, expect AUDJPY to strengthen or HSI and EEM to weaken.
Director, TerraSeeds Market Technician Pte Ltd. Trader, investor. @sohtionghum was picked ‘Top 70 Forex Twitter in 2015’.
“Dear reader, I do not have a financial license to give advice. I do not know you the reader. Your financial objective and risk tolerance may be different from mine. I am not responsible for any consequence of your action.