China’s remorseless stock selling to lead to more
Shanghai and Shenzhen markets halted after falling 7%
The Straits Times reports
SHANGHAI – Trading on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets was halted for the day on Monday (Jan 4) after shares fell seven per cent.
The drop in the CSI300 index, which covers both bourses, for the first time triggered an automatic early closure under a new system to curb volatility, after an earlier 15-minute trading halt failed to stem the declines.
Under the mechanism which coincidentally took effect on Monday, a move of 5 per cent in the CSI 300 triggers a 15-minute halt for stocks, options and index futures, while a move of 7 per cent close the market for the rest of the day. China introduced the stock-market circuit breaker to help calm volatility after last year’s summer rout sent price swings in the benchmark index to 18-year highs.
Shanghai Shenzhen CSI300 Index is a stock market index designed to replicate the performance of 300 stocks traded in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges.
Market halted twice all in less than 30 minutes
Apparently from resumption of trading after a 15 minute break, the market hit 7% marker 6 minutes later. From DaZhihui
- A shares fell sharply.
- At 1:12 pm, CSI300 down 5% which triggered a 15 minute break.
- Trading resumed at 1:27 pm.
- 6 minutes later at 1:33 pm, CSI down 7% which triggered halt to trading for the day.
No-remorse selling, no covering
If intraday is a guide, this bearish action is going to follow through.
- If the earlier action is a result of short selling, we are likely to see some short covering after the first 15 minute halt.
- Without retracement, market resumed falling with falling index-rising volume in all of 6 minutes.
This kind of remorseless selling with high participation is going to lead to some more. Finally note what I wrote about Shanghai Composite back in October 2015 (hint: also about high volume).
Director, TerraSeeds Market Technician Pte Ltd. Trader, investor. @sohtionghum was picked ‘Top 70 Forex Twitter in 2015’.
“Dear reader, I do not have a financial license to give advice. I do not know you the reader. Your financial objective and risk tolerance may be different from mine. I am not responsible for any consequence of your action.